Miastenia gravis y enfermedad de Alzheimer: una asociación a estudio / Association between myasthenia gravis and Alzheimer’s disease

Introducción La miastenia gravis (MG) y la enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) son dos de las enfermedades neurológicas en cuya fisiopatología interviene la acetilcolina en distintos niveles. En la primera, la alteración de este neurotransmisor se produce en la unión neuromuscular, y en la segunda, en el sistema nervioso central. Objetivo Analizar la posible relación entre dichas patologías estudiando la prevalencia y la odds ratio de la EA dentro de los pacientes diagnosticados de MG con respecto a la prevalencia de EA en la población general. Pacientes y métodos Se han examinado datos de las historias clínicas electrónicas del sistema de salud de Castilla-La Mancha utilizando el procesamiento de lenguaje natural a través de la plataforma clínica de inteligencia artificial Savana Manager?. Resultados Se ha identificado a 970.503 pacientes mayores de 60 años, de los que 1.028 tenían diagnóstico de MG. La proporción de pacientes con diagnóstico de EA dentro de este grupo (4,28%) es mayor que en el resto de la población (2,82%; p = 0,0047), con una odds ratio de 1,54 (intervalo de confianza al 95%: 1,13-2,08; p = 0,0051), sin que se encuentren diferencias significativas en el análisis bivariante del resto de los factores de riesgo para EA más importantes conocidos hasta ahora. Conclusiones Nuestros resultados sugieren que podría existir un aumento de la prevalencia de EA en pacientes con MG. (AU)

INTRODUCTION Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are two of the most important diseases where the dysregulation of acetylcholine activity plays a crucial role. In the first, this dysregulation happens at the level of the neu­romuscular junction and in the second, in the central nervous system (CNS). AIM To analyze the possible relationship between these two pathologies, analyzing the prevalence and the odds ratio of AD within patients previously diagnosed with MG. We will compare these data with respect to the prevalence of AD in the general population. PATIENTS AND METHODS We examined the data obtained by the electronic medical records of patients in the health care system of Castilla La Mancha using the Natural Language Process provided by a clinical platform of artificial intelligence known as the Savana Manager?. RESULTS We identified 970,503 patients over the age of 60 years, of which 1,028 were diagnosed with MG. The proportion of the patients diagnosed with AD within this group (4.28%) was greater than the rest of the population (2.82%) (p = 0,0047) with an odds ratio of 1.54 (confidence interval at 95% 1.13-2.08; p = 0.0051) without finding significant differences in the bivariate analysis for the rest of the most important actual known risk factors for AD. CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that there might be an increase in the prevalence of AD in patients previously diagnosed with MG. (AU)

Herpetic esophagitis in immunocompentent host: cases report.

BACKGROUND: Herpetic esophagitis (EH) usually affects those who are immunocompromised and is uncommon in immunocompetent patients. In these cases, EH may occasionally present as an acute and self-limited illness. Such cases are rare and only a few have beenreported and limited published reviews exist making the benefits of antiviral therapy in immunocompetent patients unknown. CASE PRESENTATION: We report four cases of young patients who presented dysphagia, odynophagia and epigastric pain. Endoscopic findings revealed lesions in the distal esophagus and histopathological changes compatible with herpes virus infection confirmed by viral DNA in every case. After treatment, every patient showed significant improvement and tolerated oral intake after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In this publication, we present four immunocompetent patients with EH, without relevant alterations in laboratory workup and with negative HIV status. This disease is infrequent in patients with such characteristics and there are few cases published. In order to better understand this pathology, we present the symptoms, the endoscopic alterations and the clinical evolution with treatment. In our series, 50% of patients had serology compatible with acute HVS type 1 infection, 25% had a subacute infection pattern (IgM and IgG positive antibodies) and in another 25% of patients, serology was not done. No patient presented leukocyte alterations, while all patients presented with anatomopathological findings compatible with acute herpetic esophagitis and responded to acyclovir therapy.